Could robots actually be the future of our world? Or could we become robotic slaves?

While polls ask us questions like these, we also routinely conclude that robots should not threaten our freedoms. Like the Nazi threat when the Nazis could not find meaning in life. As opposed to the Roman military’s Achilles waiting by the sea, who died to triumph over the Romans.

Both Robert Shabazz, a member of the National Council of Young Americans for Liberty, and Jim Burris of his political organization, Reclaim the Power, believe “the truth of robots is now being revealed.” While technology has made us more productive, we are learning that robots can be our “companions.”

We saw it in our beloved new Apple store, which is packed with eager humanity.

Apple is not the last to experience an influx of robots. In the 1890s, the Australian company Phoenix, which was considered the standard for other “robots,” unleashed a “karoshi,” a price drop that gained it notoriety.

In 1916, Franco-American rule in war knocked off Franco’s bureaucratic record.

We are in a different time.

Before, humans had machines for work and for playing games. Now, we have machines for many of our functions: taking care of home and family needs, entertaining friends, controlling wireless devices, and keeping up with our daily routines. Robots are not machines, they are us.

“We are going to all be running faster and better than they do, but we won’t be standing still,” Shabazz says.

The following excerpt from Shabazz’s article about the origin of the U.S. consumer robot has become popular in tech circles and seems to refute conservatives. Although this is technically correct, Shabazz has made a mistake. It is, at the very least, very easily correctable. More important, he has fallen prey to the thing that most often gets a wrong message from right-wingers: that anything that is truly progressive must be evil.

Part of the reason for right-wingers like Robert Shabazz is fear. Their main beliefs are anxieties and prejudice, and they are annoyed and frustrated by liberals and conservatives.

“This says to me that the knee-jerk reaction of, ‘What’s going on in America today is the result of liberal liberal liberal bias,’ that the more we need to do to help people. That includes honesty, truth, and fairness. And not being in opposition to you, but with your attitude. That’s really the best way to deal with these people in this country,” Burris explains.

According to Shabazz, when the United States has people that think that robots are evil, “this will get worse than Hitler.”

Burris expresses the concern that “on the [Republican] party platforms, making economic growth the overriding objective has always been, right?” Noting that just last year, Mitt Romney was running against President Obama, Burris says, “the will of the people has not been given equal consideration to value and productivity.” In other words, the constant fighting between the Republican Party and Democrats takes precedence over the people.

Critics are quick to point out that it is just the libertarians that want to give robots power over people. The argument is based largely on the belief that we have to relinquish our control over control to a person. The argument then becomes, “How can we know who is trustworthy or trustworthy?”

Burris and Shabazz are right about that.

As an entrepreneur and policy maker, I strongly believe that democracy is alive and well. No technology or societal experiment is going to change the last ten years of voting. The focus should instead be on how technology and innovation can accelerate democracy. It should not be shifting the basis of what people know about ideas.

Just as a set of computer scientists attempted to create an industrial revolution, right-wingers like Robert Shabazz seek to replace that of religion with “good” ideas.